Kiley's Original Plans, Honored
Wrong Term, Wrong Tree
By now, most of you have probably read the piece in Sunday's Post Dispatch highlighting the original plans that Dan Kiley had for the Arch grounds. It is a worthy read that details why the initial concept was not fully implemented. Some members of the our Chapter's Executive Committee supplied background information for the article and were pleased with the way that it illuminated how the decades old design is embraced by the new plans submitted for the current competition.
If you read the piece closely, you know that Dan Kiley was referred to as something other than his established professional role. Eyebrows were raised at the use of 'landscaper' to describe Kiley. Stephen Ibendahl, Chapter Vice-President, contacted Tim O'Neil, Post Dispatch reporter, to inquire about his use of differing terms.
O'Neil indicated that he meant no disrespect to the profession and chose to employ his journalistic license to avoid an overuse. "I simply didn't want to say "architect" twice within about four words in that particular sentence." explained O'Neil.
ETV thinks it is quite clear that Mr. O'Neil understands the distinction, his extensive research behind the article shows a deep appreciation for the evolving site that is the Arch grounds. If you've not read it yourself, please do; it draws on diverse sources and explains some history that even St Louis natives may be unaware of:
The idea was for a pastoral place amidst downtown bustle that would complement, not clutter, the glistening form rising above trees, lawns and ponds. There were quibbles over details, but today's 91-acre riverfront park is essentially what architect Eero Saarinen and landscaper Dan Kiley had in mind... "He loved working with Eero, and he told tales of no sleep and lots of gin," Meyer said. "Overall, the (Arch) grounds were pretty true to what he designed. He was proud of it. He wanted the broad sweep and the purity of it. For him, anything else was just decoration.